|
|
| Sandwork Waveview vs. EZWave | ||
| Author z315 Views 7 Posted at 2008/8/28 00:06 [View In Forum] | ||
|
Hello,hxnrvcpa hxnrvcpa hxnrvcpa hxnrvcpa I actually use EZWave to view the waves results of my simulation (with eldo). But I don't like this viewer : it doesn't support very big file, there are a lot of bugs and the script possibilities are too low (or bad documented).hxnrvcpa hxnrvcpa hxnrvcpa hxnrvcpa I heard some positive feddback concerning Waveview Analyzer from Sandwork.hxnrvcpa hxnrvcpa hxnrvcpa hxnrvcpa Have you already used this tool ? Do you know other tools better than EZWave ?hxnrvcpa hxnrvcpa hxnrvcpa hxnrvcpa Thanks a lot |
| Reply No. | Replier | Total Replies 9 [View All Replies] [New Reply] | Replied at |
| 1 | btcdtc | sandwork is now part of synopsys, so maybe the eldo support will be dropped... | 2008/8/28 00:06 |
| 2 | zunwang | Hi, I have used a lot EZwave and Sandworks viewers, and I really prefer EZwave. Although, each viewer has its strong points. Which version of EZwave do you use ? And what is the typical size of your databases. Can you tell me too how many waves you have in you database? By my side, I have databases up to "5-6Gb and it works well. I noticed also that this viewer was greatly enhanced over last versions. (My current version is 2007.1) Another advise : Do you launch Eldo in batch mode and then open the wdb during the simulation with EZwave ? In this case, it is very useful for monitoring but not very fast. You should start Eldo directly with EZwave (option -ezwave), or open the database later when the simulation is finished. |
2008/8/28 00:06 |
| 3 | anuo2008 | Hi, which size do you handle to have troubles with Ezwave ? what kind of bug have you met ? my experience is not so bad ... Bozzo. |
2008/8/28 00:06 |
| 4 | lassa | Hi, The size of my files is between 5GB to 40GB. I don't have more than 20-30 wave in my database. I always open the database when my simulation is finished. The version I used is quite old : AMS2004.3. Some few bugs I met : - ezwave crash quite often - the waves are not always correctly displayed (specially when I zoom on the wave) - the X and Y axis are sometimes not correctly set (view all function) And there is no scripting possibility that can automatize some tasks |
2008/8/28 00:06 |
| 5 | booksir | I complain also about windows3.1 capabilities You should definitely use a newer version. Speed and capacity are far better, and there is Tcl scripting now. |
2008/8/28 00:06 |
| 6 | wy830115 | ok, I will try a newer version of EZWave. That is mean that anybody have found a better viewer than EZWave ? |
2008/8/28 00:06 |
| 7 | mxg330 | ezwave was full bugs... 2005.03 works good. later always better! | 2008/8/28 00:06 |
| 8 | fujun2013 | I used Sandwork Waveview and Cadence Wavescan. Waveview is worth a try. This is my favorite waveform viewer. | 2008/8/28 00:06 |
| 9 | knoxville | good luck | 2010/7/31 16:18 |
Total Replies 9 Thread Per Page 10
|
|||
