|
|
| ASSURA VS CALIBRE VS DIVA | ||
| Author ybyygu Views 14 Posted at 2008/8/27 14:29 [View In Forum] | ||
|
Which is the best tool for verification,userfriendly for layoutwtcm wtcm a)Assura.wtcm wtcm b)Calibre.wtcm wtcm c)Divawtcm wtcm wtcm wtcm wtcm wtcm vote for ur best verfication tool. |
| Reply No. | Replier | Total Replies 22 [View All Replies] [New Reply] | Replied at |
| 1 | fujun2013 | I worked on Assura for physical verification and RC extraction. It is very user friendly.... | 2008/8/27 14:29 |
| 2 | gao51755775 | it is good to master them all. | 2008/8/27 14:29 |
| 3 | z315 | I prefer Calibre. It is faster and easy to use. Bastos |
2008/8/27 14:29 |
| 4 | btcdtc | I think Calibre is the industry-standard for back-end verfication. It's very powerful and it's not hard to learn | 2008/8/27 14:29 |
| 5 | chdd | Obviously Calibra is better in its easy usage and powerful functionalities. However, Cadence has the most complete flow and Assura is also not too bad. | 2008/8/27 14:29 |
| 6 | booksir | Calibre is best.............75% market is captured by Mentor it is good for Digital layout Assura is good for Analog layout if it is mixed then calibre...................... |
2008/8/27 14:29 |
| 7 | ken7976 | Calibre is the best. I think. | 2008/8/27 14:29 |
| 8 | ybyygu | Calibre is the industry standard as said before. If your process supports Calibre definitely go for it. For large and complicated circuits it is much faster. For smaller and simpler assura is also good. |
2008/8/27 14:29 |
| 9 | lassa | digital: Calibre Custom digital/analog: Assura small analog design & older process for 0.18um: Diva for RF circuit postsimulation: only for Assura rcx. |
2008/8/27 14:29 |
| 10 | z4120356 | calibre, I think. It's very easy to use.. | 2008/8/27 14:29 |
Total Replies 22 Thread Per Page 10
|
|||
