Do you believe? - RFEDA Forum

Reply No.	Replier	Total Replies 28 [View All Replies] [New Reply]	Replied at

1	edu	Do you believe? I m wid u !! best of luck	2008/8/26 08:16

2	chdd	Do you believe? well see this...don't take it seriously its just fun... Universe[a] is built from simple equations equations is built by human being[c] human being[c] is built by G O D[d]. now if u replace built by "=" then a=b=c=d; and our mathematics says.... a=d; now again replace "=" with built and the respective values of a and d, Universe is built by G O D... so simple,, have fun,	2008/8/26 08:16

3	htc2498	Do you believe? The equations is f=m.a Because it got mass, time, and distance component in it. and it is in vector so the direction of the universe do exist. And most of all, i dont know what i'm saying.	2008/8/26 08:16

4	netlgc	Do you believe? here is the secret gravity CURVES space time, the intitial formala for this is R = kT electromagnetics TWISTS spacetime, the initial formula for this is: F^a = A(0) * T^a. both curveture and twisting are related to each othe through geometry and thus the unified field equations are found through differential geometry methods. one can then go through the trouble of reworking all of physics (one section at a time) and can derrive all the same equations as quantum mechanics (for example) but WITHOUT ad-hoc assumptions! all derrived from first principles and therefore is presented a nice closed solution, completely covarient. the fun part is how the combined math reveals NEW interpretations and possible systems. hey, that's what engineers do, we turn equations into practical invention. can i prove this mathematically? yes. can i prove this experimentally? yes. am i going to go through the trouble of typing it all out for you here? no. Mr.Cool	2008/8/26 08:16

5	spacebac	Do you believe? Well... Practically most well known electronic and physics equations are build on top of the foundations of simple 3 variable equations (F=MA, Mol=Mass/Reletive fomula mass and V=IR just to name a few) It is only until we combine these equations and add constants do they become more interesting (Power=(Culomb旳mp)/Farad) . But sometimes, we can combine massive equations into a neat little package (e=mc?. But from the point of view of an elementary student. I think it is possible to create a simple 3 variable equations. But I hope it never happens because it is sooooooo fun learning things by trial and error (eg. Dynamite!!! Did they guy survive? I'm not too good with history)&(suspending 1kg of sodium into a toilet and flushing it) . Mr. Cool Please enlighten us upon this important maths, I promise I won't forge it .	2008/8/26 08:16

6	gao51755775	Do you believe? be careful what you ask for, the mathematics is 12 years in the making and is just now spawning practical bench tested (and repeatable) results. so i say "i won't type it out here" not because i am trying to be mysterious, but because it would take too long. here is a logical argument to wet your whistle.. http://www.edaboard.com/viewtopic.php?t=128470&highlight= Mr.Cool	2008/8/26 08:16

7	mxg330	Do you believe? I hope most of the articles in this topic move around the Grand Unification Theory. The theory of combining the weakest and the strongest forces in one equation. I've read a lot about it and am too interested to know more. They say its also supported by the hidden variable theory. Can any one shed more light on it?	2008/8/26 08:16

8	wy830115	Do you believe? the hidden variable theory is a way to take standard theory and make it explain the stuff that it can not. so i think this is well achieved because bending the rules - while staying within the framework - is a difficult challenge! however, if you select a different framework, one that is built on first principles is generally covariant, and relativisitcally correct, then maybe you don't need such theories. maybe the math itself is self explainitory and you don't need to resort to such cheating methods. here is the rub.. space-time curves because of mass. which of course is just energy. electromagnetics (which is also a form of energy) was build from maxwell equations (actually the heaviside/gibbs basteridization version of it is the one we know.. not the maxwell version) with one significant assumption. that space time is flat! what? but we already estabilished that space-time has curvature due to energy and that electromagnetis is also energy... yes... look at the quations of "maxwell's 4 equations".. do you see ANYTHING that represents knowledge of a curvature? no.. because it is assumed to be not relevant to a local use. well... this is a mistake.. more more kindly, an assumption that no longer needs to be employed. let us re-work the maxwell equations (all of them, not just the 4) with the idea that space-time is curved/twisted. once you do this you see the connection between EM fields and gravity and also some other "stuff" and you have the grand unification theory. what will you come up with now? how will you build your circuits now? Mr.Cool	2008/8/26 08:16

9	zunwang	Do you believe?	2008/8/26 08:16

10	ct731	Do you believe? give me ONE postulate that is newly predicted from string theory. sheesh.. the only thing that is good about string theory is that it ties all the standard model ideas of physics together nicely. but string theory does not predict anything new so if it IS a "theory of everything" and does not predict anything new .. then either we already know everything there is to know or the theory sux. take your pick Mr.Cool	2008/8/26 08:16
Total Replies 28 Thread Per Page 10 Page 1/3 \|< << 1 2 3 >> >\|